Fastly vs Edgecast
Fastly vs Edgecast – which is the best content delivery network provider? This is a question that many potential CDN customers ask themselves as they search for the best solution for their online content delivery needs. Both Fastly and Edgecast offer very attractive CDN options, with high speed global networks and leading technologies designed to make the most of the bandwidth available when delivering data such as static files and dynamic information across many different kinds of networks, including high latency mobile networks. In this short article, we’ll look at some key differences and see whether we can answer the question of Fastly vs Edgecast.
Fastly vs Edgecast: Network
Both Fastly and Edgecast have developed high speed networks that reach right across the globe. Fastly currently have 22 points of presence (PoPs) at their disposal, with another 8 under construction. These PoPs have been placed at some of the busiest internet crossroads, ensuring most of the world’s data is extremely close to the Fastly network
The Edgecast network is equally powerful with with points of presence located in cities including Dallas, LA, Chicago, New York, San Francisco, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, London Madrid, Hong Kong, Sydney and many more. In addition to these servers, EdgeCast have created SuperPoPs at strategic areas of high traffic density, with masses of bandwidth to ensure traffic is delivered quickly even at peak times.
Fastly vs Edgecast: Customers
The best evidence of Fastly and Edgecast’s CDN quality is their customer list. Fastly boasts Business Insider, Vimeo, Upworthy Twitter, Imgur, Voxer, PubNub, Lonely Planet and ModCloth amongst their customers.
Not to be outdone, Edgecast has attracted equally large names to use their content delivery network. These include Bitdefender, Colts, Mozilla, EMI, Ranker, The Atlantic and Wiredrive.
Fastly vs Edgecast: Technology
Fastly’s stand out technology advantage comes in the form of their use of solid-state hard drives (SSDs) in all their servers. By using SSDs, their network achieves much faster random seek and load times when compared to traditional spinning platter drives.
Edgecast, on the other hand, have more traditional technologies at their disposal. Their key CDN technologies include active failover and redundancy, edge compression, intelligent path optimisation and high quality, 24-hour support.